A patient is attending your ED multiple times per week, often in the early hours of the morning. Each time, they present with vague symptoms and are usually discharged. The nursing staff are frustrated. How would you approach this?

Tips to guide your answer

- Frequent attenders: often defined as 7+ ED visits per year

- Research: 45% have psychiatric disorder, 49% have alcohol-related disorder, significantly lower self-reported health status

- Risk: frequent attenders can have genuine acute pathology missed because staff become complacent ("normalisation of deviance")

- Management: individualised care plans, case management, liaison with GP and community mental health team, patient navigators, addressing social determinants (housing, isolation, substance misuse)

Sign in to unlock speak mode

Create account Sign in

How to approach this Emergency Medicine interview question

This quality improvement question is common in Emergency Medicine NHS interviews because it reveals how you think under interview pressure, not just what facts you can recall. Use "A patient is attending your ED multiple times per week, often in the early hours of the..." as the anchor for a concise answer with a clear opening, a clinical or professional structure, and a reflective close.

What the panel is testing

A strong quality-improvement answer uses method as well as enthusiasm. Be clear about the problem, baseline measurement, intervention, re-measurement, and how the change was made sustainable. For emergency medicine, keep the answer time-aware. Panels expect prioritisation, early senior involvement, concise handover, and awareness of department flow without losing sight of the individual patient.

Separate audit, QI, research, and clinical governance clearly so the panel can follow your reasoning.
Use a real cycle: baseline, intervention, re-measurement, learning, and sustainability.
Link the project back to patient safety, service reliability, or measurable outcomes.

How to structure your answer

For a quality improvement prompt, aim for a short opening sentence, then two or three evidence-led points, then a final reflection. If you use STAR, keep the result and reflection as strong as the situation. If it is a clinical scenario, say what you would do now, what you would do next, and how you would keep the patient safe while help is coming.

Open by naming the main issue in the question.
Give a structured response rather than a memorised script.
End with escalation, documentation, learning, or follow-up.

Common mistakes to avoid

The weakest answers usually stay too vague, ignore the specific role, or miss the safety issue hidden in the question. Do not use this page to memorise a perfect paragraph. Use it to rehearse the shape of a safe answer, then adapt it to your own experience and the post you are applying for.

Frequent attenders: often defined as 7+ ED visits per year
Research: 45% have psychiatric disorder, 49% have alcohol-related disorder, significantly lower self-reported health status
Risk: frequent attenders can have genuine acute pathology missed because staff become complacent ("normalisation of deviance")