Two consultants in your department are in an ongoing personal dispute that is now affecting how they communicate about shared patients during handover. What do you do?

Tips to guide your answer

- This tests your ability to navigate a situation where senior colleagues' interpersonal conflict is creating clinical risk, but where you are junior to both parties.

- The scenario is common in real practice and particularly difficult because you have no formal authority over either consultant.

- Interviewers want to see that you recognise the patient safety dimension, that you do not take sides, and that you escalate appropriately.

Sign in to unlock speak mode

Create account Sign in

How to approach this Shared interview question

This leadership question is common in NHS interviews because it reveals how you think under interview pressure, not just what facts you can recall. Use "Two consultants in your department are in an ongoing personal dispute that is now..." as the anchor for a concise answer with a clear opening, a clinical or professional structure, and a reflective close.

What the panel is testing

A strong leadership answer is concrete. Describe the situation, the people involved, the decision you made, and how you created follow-through. Avoid sounding heroic; NHS panels usually prefer reliable team leadership. For shared NHS interview questions, keep the answer portable across roles. Use one relevant example, explain your reasoning, and make the link to safe patient care explicit.

Give a practical example of leading through communication, delegation, and follow-up rather than job title alone.
Show how you kept the team aligned while protecting patient safety and psychological safety.
Reflect on what changed afterwards and what you would do differently next time.

How to structure your answer

For a leadership prompt, aim for a short opening sentence, then two or three evidence-led points, then a final reflection. If you use STAR, keep the result and reflection as strong as the situation. If it is a clinical scenario, say what you would do now, what you would do next, and how you would keep the patient safe while help is coming.

Open by naming the main issue in the question.
Give a structured response rather than a memorised script.
End with escalation, documentation, learning, or follow-up.

Common mistakes to avoid

The weakest answers usually stay too vague, ignore the specific role, or miss the safety issue hidden in the question. Do not use this page to memorise a perfect paragraph. Use it to rehearse the shape of a safe answer, then adapt it to your own experience and the post you are applying for.

This tests your ability to navigate a situation where senior colleagues' interpersonal conflict is creating clinical risk, but where you are junior to both parties.
The scenario is common in real practice and particularly difficult because you have no formal authority over either consultant.
Interviewers want to see that you recognise the patient safety dimension, that you do not take sides, and that you escalate appropriately.